Page 2 of 3

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:08 pm
by Am0rIn0
Cool meme. For those far left air head SJW's and their double standards it's all about attention and their small ego.

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 3:23 pm
by robuk
olga cabaeva wrote:
robuk wrote:Love it Olga..usually women in the Uk telling other women how to act and what to wear...liberated.

Yeep! I know UK a bit ::: they banned a lots of fetishes like face-sitting ,fisting,squirt now ;-.
That's strange side of feminism . All these far left ladies shout about My Body Is My Choice and I can wear that I want but they left hundreds grid/ring girls without job .

None of the women in my life agree with it..sisters or their friends or my partner and hers..its generally a vocal minority that stamp their feet and get more attention..does seem strange when one women tells another how to live her life or dress then claim to care about womens lib...and the UK is sliding into a puritanical age with new porn laws coming in April that will censor the net and force adults to prove their age using credit cards..possibly even more intrusive data will have to be provided.
Women are still allowed to orgasm..but you better not leak in the UK :wink:

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 3:52 pm
by olga cabaeva
robuk wrote:...and the UK is sliding into a puritanical age with new porn laws coming in April that will censor the net and force adults to prove their age using credit cards..possibly even more intrusive data will have to be provided.:

DVD shops accepting cash must be back :::

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 3:53 pm
by olga cabaeva
superduper wrote:Discuss,

How about a nice little romance and kiss, before they fuck ?

:D

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:34 pm
by robuk
:lol: Olga you're good.

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 11:53 pm
by olga cabaeva
:::
robuk wrote::lol: Olga you're good.

Thanx :::
I'm agree with ethical concept of porn which means to be made by consenting people. Producers must respect performers on set. And,yes,it's not nice if somebody steals your content and put on free tubes. I got today very good offer from Abby Winters,they want to shoot B/G with me but I must bring my bf,because they shoot like couple sex. They offer 750€ for each performer+ hotel+flight tickets. I think,this is feminism and ethical treatment of performers. (Unfortunly I must reject it cause I don't have bf)
Even BDSM company like Kink can be ethical,if you have clear conditions ,decent fee and you consent about the shoot.

But I am not into far left politic. I 'm tired to read about white supremacism, fetishismo is a form of racism, hijab is a symbol of freedom etc...literally you can be acused of homophobia just because you don't want to fuck a transsexual,because" gender doesn't matter ;-. "

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 11:58 pm
by krull
Olga, you just don't realise how oppressed you are! You have internalised misogyny, and you secretly hate yourself!!

Hmm.. what's the gender pay gap between the 74 other genders??

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:27 am
by bakerboy
remember her ? Nothing has changed since the 80ties...

Image

she also stated that women have no ability to consent whether to be in porn or not, they need the government to tell them no....

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:11 pm
by olga cabaeva
krull wrote:Olga, you just don't realise how oppressed you are! You have internalised misogyny, and you secretly hate yourself!!

And I have babyfobia ::: This guy contacted me couple times http://plasticmommy.com/tour.html but honestly I couldn't do it. I told him G/G can be ok,but not B/G. I think,he is ok,many girls shoot for his websites...But...its a bit too much for me

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 4:21 pm
by robuk
I used to really like Abby Winters a few years back especially when it featured a lot of Australian girls..even then it was a pretty ethical site however I have a feeling the Aussie government were not too keen on it and it became more European,still had some cracking girls on it some of which went onto Hegre...don't think in general the girls are as pretty as they once were,seem to like featuring hairy lesbians and more masculine looking women which doesn't do it for me..think I still have some unused credits with the site....if you happen to turn up on AW doing a lesbian scene I can use them then Olga :wink:

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 5:40 pm
by krull
olga cabaeva wrote:http://plasticmommy.com/tour.html


What the HELL is this?! Olga please hold me, I'm scared.. :(

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:10 pm
by olga cabaeva
robuk wrote:I used to really like Abby Winters a few years back especially when it featured a lot of Australian girls..even then it was a pretty ethical site however I have a feeling the Aussie government were not too keen on it and it became more European,still had some cracking girls on it some of which went onto Hegre...don't think in general the girls are as pretty as they once were,seem to like featuring hairy lesbians and more masculine looking women which doesn't do it for me..think I still have some unused credits with the site....if you happen to turn up on AW doing a lesbian scene I can use them then Olga :wink:

I think,they also shot all possible aussie girls. Yes,they move company to Amsterdam but they shoot in Spain and UK too. It's lack of models makes them to book average looking ladies. When I was younger AW rejected me ,but now when I am Milf there were happy to book me. They are not so strict with look and age any more,they even book girls with tattoos. Before AW wanted just fresh ,brand new,beautiful girl aged 18-24. Now they are ok if you shot something in the past,the age started no matter much,they have some models over 30 on website. But ,yes,they are still picky about your skin condition and you must send them grooming pictures all time before the shoot: no itching,irritation,acne, eczema etc. They shot mostly with natural lights and no make up allowed.
But I guess,many companies dropped the level of models,not just AW. We are lucky with Photoshop and filters,everyone looks beautiful ::: . I think I can modelling till my 70 s.
I shot solo and duo solo for AW, but I don't know when they put my scenes on line.

krull wrote:
olga cabaeva wrote:http://plasticmommy.com/tour.html


What the HELL is this?! Olga please hold me, I'm scared.. :(

Just British fetish website ::: Yeee,it's make me a bit scared tooo

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 9:25 pm
by bmg
Nice scam - shoot couples making love and sell it to others - all for 750...

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 11:31 pm
by olga cabaeva
bmg wrote:Nice scam - shoot couples making love and sell it to others - all for 750...

1500€ for b/g or g/g couple.750€ for each performer.
I don't know how they sell it but it was that they pay. I'm sure other companies pay much better in Europe. Like 5000€ for each performer ::: It's just me who gets such 'cheap ' proposition

Re: Porn should be less sexist and more naturalistic

PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2018 2:16 pm
by robuk
I met one of the British girls from AW a few years ago at London Zoo during some naked event...she was naked I wasn't :)
God I used to love the Aussie girls...they did things like naked yoga on AW,don't think the site is as half as good now but will keep an eye out for your solo Olga.