Am0rIn0 wrote:it is a question of offer and demand. if nobody would spend money on solo stuff all these super models would need to do bg.
Interesting point of view but unfortunately so true.
If you think of it, met-art/petter hegre and similar nude/solo photography sites became big players since the early to mid 2000's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MET-ArtIt's from this time that similar "artsy fartsy" sites blossomed.
It's also from this time on that you just don't see
extremely beautiful girls any longer in hardcore boy/girl.
I mean, the ongoing female model talent (also more natural blondes) of private/woodman in the golden 90s was bizarre. Many of those girls would choose a "safe" career in solo/nude photography now for sure. Models get paid well and many customers pay well for a subscription. Future non-porn career of the girl is guaranteed (no porn stigma for "nude art photos") and everybody happy. Of course, internet/social media going mainstream and the thus fear for harassment/stalking/outing plays a big role too.
Personally, I wish more people were like me and see collecting material of girls who will never do boys on cam as a waste of money.
Then the circle will be round and we'll see them popping up in hardcore porn again just like you said.
If I want to see beautiful girls, I go buy eastern european Playboy. At least I will also have articles to read in stead of only watching nudie pictures of a nice looking woman (one of hundreds of millions). If this would be my call, I would make "ebi2" and place all the girls there who only do solo/nudephotography (and perhaps soft lesbo).