from lukeisback.com: Porn Valley Is Doomed

everything else

from lukeisback.com: Porn Valley Is Doomed

Postby STEMCELL on Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:19 pm

blame Bush :lol:

April 11, 2008, 1:09 PM
Porn Valley Is Doomed
By LUKE IS BACK |


Very succinct and clear article from The Huffington Post on why the business of content is dying.

"Content is king," many people believe, meaning that films, television shows, music, news and information are more profitable assets than the technology used to deliver them. But there’s an older, cautionary aphorism that applies as well: "Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown." Content may be king, but, ironically, its perceived value today is being driven towards zero. In the eyes of consumers, content is becoming a commodity — more a commoner than a king.

The more I talk to traditional DVD-centric porners, the more I am concerned that their children will not have the opportunity to attend Ivy League schools and receive BMWs for their 17th birthdays. As the DVD business atrophies at a dizzying pace (3-4 years seems to be the agreed upon life expectancy for DVD as a viable business model), these old school smut peddlers are scrambling to evolve. Blu-Ray and any other high-definition physical model is going to be an afterthought. A never-ran. These companies continue to cash their $5000 AEBN royalty checks, a model in which they are getting paid 15-20% of gross. Of course in the process, they are teaching their customer that spending $35 on a DVD is absurd.

The smart ones partnered with web-savvy companies years ago, or spawned their own competent web divisions. New Sensations/Digital Sin has done it as well as any. Their affiliate program, NSCash, is strong and well-supported within the web industry. Others have tried. Wicked, Vivid, Evil Angel, Anabolic, Shane’s World have all started up their own web divisions, and went through multiple incarnations before arriving here today.

Most independent producers (Jules Jordan, Erik Everhard, Brandon Iron, etc.) have partnered with companies like Braincash and Meatcash so that they can focus on content production. But again, they are giving up somewhere in the neighborhood of 50% for the privilege. Compare that to the traditional 30-35% that DVD distributors take.

Web-based companies like Brazzers and RealityKings spread their riches around in production circles, which in turn keeps production costs on the upslope. At some point, the 20% of VOD royalties and the 50% of paysite revenues won’t be able to justify the cost of shooting high-priced gonzo movies. Foreign and broadcast money is almost non-existent, due to the high supply and low demand for the content.

When will this simple arithmetic break Porn Valley?

User avatar
STEMCELL
Pirate
 
Posts: 6463
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:12 pm
Location: 2001:0db8:85a3:08d3::/64

Re: from lukeisback.com: Porn Valley Is Doomed

Postby dap-addict on Mon May 05, 2008 12:42 pm

This may be the force behind Brandon Iron returning to shoot in Europe recently.
:arrow: US producers have to cut costs somewhere.

Looks good actually for Prague/Budapest again. :)
User avatar
dap-addict
DAP Devil
 
Posts: 12297
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Location: Central Europe

Postby priapos on Sun Jul 20, 2008 12:41 pm

But the demand will continue to drive the supply. If PV were to be wiped off the face of the planet tomorrow, the next day the boys & girls would be setting up shop in Vegas or wherever. Surely the model for handling content will continue to change rapidly in the near future, but without someone supplying new material for compensation, the whole gig would be up.

Maybe everything will just go amateur & homemade in 5 or 10 years when every 18 year old in America will have their own web-cam site, like they have their slutty MySpace pages today. Sex will have become totally commodified and porn will be all that remains.
Πρίαπος
User avatar
priapos
Respected member
 
Posts: 799
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Boston not LA

Postby Billbo on Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:30 pm

Part of the problem is the insistence on quantity over quality. A few outfits like Vivid and DDF do the quality route and clean up. Vivid makes more than a hundred million per year.

Part is good models. Part is makeup. Part is cameras and where to point them.

One doesn't see endless minutes, for example, of just shots of genitalia. Few things are more irritating that wanting to see a beautiful woman in action, when you never get to see anything but the crotch.

If a woman has a pretty face and nice breasts or is nice everywhere, why don't we get to see her anywhere but "down there"? One really could get to hate porn because of that kind of nonsense.

The silliness is another factor. Why edit in moaning by the girl when the girl is doing the work, not receiving the pleasure?

Face it, porn industry: when everybody and his kid brother with a 300 kilopixel camera decided to get into the porn scene in the last decade, the average quality went WAAAAAAAY down and there is only so much money out there that people are going to spend on it.
Billbo
Respected member
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 8:23 am


Return to Nonsense

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests