Am0rIn0 wrote:you dont understand. because you must differ from female conscious (emotional comfort) and their subconscious (attraction).
Well, if I understand them and also women tell me that I understand them, who are you to tell me that I don’t understand them?
It shows that you live in a different reality, or as the pick-up community calls it, the “hidden reality” which of course is bull-shit and doesn’t exist.
Am0rIn0 wrote:look the subconscious wants alpha males due to her physical and mental strenght.
I know a lot of women who are clearly sick of so-called alpha male behaviour, not only consciously but also unconsciously, because of their bad experiences with players. Also, I don’t agree with you that those guys are mentally stronger, because they can not withstand their instincts, they just act like their gut feelings tell them to act, and can not go against it. This is mental weakness, not strength. If you are horny like hell, and you meet a pretty girl, it’s mentally weak if you only think about fucking her, instead of approaching her like a person and keep your instincts in control.
Am0rIn0 wrote: pu gives you the tools to create that missing attraction.
Again you say that you can impose attraction on others, that you as a man must control her feelings, and this is typical dominant player talk. Attraction must come from both sides and must come naturally. If not, it is called manipulation of women, and women hate this. Attraction is not a tool, because it happens between two people, and so it only works if both people feel attracted in the first place.
Am0rIn0 wrote:a hot babe 9/10 can stand more negs and teasing than a 6/10 of course. also it depemds on your looks and selfesteem, if you have the selfesteem/charisma of a rock star they often get attracted only by your body language.
And who decides who is 9/10 and who is 6/10? Maybe I feel much more attracted to the girl who is in your eyes 6/10 and the 9/10 leaves me stone cold. Or do you believe there is something like “absolute beauty” which causes attraction to all men? I don’t believe in it. Everybody has their own different priorities about what (s)he finds attractive in another person, this is not a static fact.
A lot of women don’t like rock stars at all, and even if they attract a lot of girls, I wouldn’t want to be a rock star, simply because I don’t like their music and style of egocentric arrogance that they often have.
Am0rIn0 wrote:in some extremes this is right. for example she is gothic chick with tats and piercings and you are the kind of guy who wear suits.
It’s not extreme, it is the normal situation that it takes two people to create attraction.
It is not the man only who decides that he will “make” the girl feel attracted to him. He can only manipulate and force her, which is disrespecting the autonomy of the girl as an individual who must make her own decisions.
Am0rIn0 wrote:see it that way: did you ever love a girl but she was not attracted to you? i bet every normal guy had this situation at least once in his life. sooner or later that girl you love will get fucked by another one. so it is simple: if you dont manage to fuck her another one will fuck her sooner or later. pu gives you the tools to get her. if you do it to keep a girl into releationship because you love/like her or dump her after has nothing to do with pu. this is a personal decision. pu is just a tool, the responsibility lies in the hands of the user. with a screwdriver you can fasten a screw but you can also injure somebody with it!
There are no tools that a man can “use” to create attraction, it must come from both sides. Many men wished that there were tools to “get” a woman like you say, but there aren’t any. There are only tools to improve yourself, not to attract women who don’t feel attracted to you. If your goal is to fuck her even if she refused you, it is called rape. “Tools to fuck her” are tools to get her into your room in order to rape her, which is a crime.
“Keep her or dump her”, another statement that indicates, that it’s you and ONLY you who decides what you will do with her, she has nothing to say about it. Man, you are one of the worst type of men that a girl can meet, especially if they are insecure or vulnerable for these things. Relationships are between two people, you can not decide from only your point of view what you "will get her”. Please stop abusing girls and visit a prostitute, it is much better for everybody, because the rules of the game are clear for everybody there. You pay money, she gives sex, easy like you want it. And no hearts will be broken.
Am0rIn0 wrote:than if you feel she is from mentality too different from you you must be fast too lay her same day.
If she is too different from you and you feel that it’s not going to work, you are going to fuck her anyways against her will???
Then you are just an egocentric rapist of the worst kind, disrespectful asshole who rapes women and is proud of it. Same on you!
Am0rIn0 wrote:very very wrong. on these sites are also sometimes girls who are interested in this topic and confirm pu.
Yes, I saw that. Those girls are the ones that you never want end up with on a night out, because you know that they are going to play with your balls. They are just the female version of players. Sometimes I talked with them out of curiosity, and to know how they work. They pretend to be interested, but you can see in their eyes that they just want to get laid. They ask questions like “are you gay?” just to see how you react, not because they seriously are wondering. If you reject them, you can expect some kind of “revenge”, because they think, just like Amorino, that they can control other people’s feelings and ignite attraction from one side. If you want to take more time, they become angry and try to dump you in a mean way, sometimes even spreading lies like telling your best friend that you had sex with his girlfriend. That's why player's behaviour is all about power play and manipulation, making people feel bad and punishing them for making their own decisions. Ego-centrism and disrespect rule the world of players, so it's better to stay away from it.
Am0rIn0 wrote:great that you already have the emotional comfort, now you just need the attraction and she is yours otherise another one will fuck her sooner or later.
If she doesn’t feel attracted, she can indeed better find another guy who she feels attracted to then. Why would I want to fuck girls that don’t feel attracted to me? I’m not a rapist.
Am0rIn0 wrote:there is a very fine line between showing her that you want her and running after her kissing her ass. trust me most nice guys destroy their chances with that. these who were successful in the end over the years did accidently use some pu tools without knowing it. maybe they freezed her for a period which built up attraction. all the heart melting stories you hear are basically because that guy acidently built up attraction with a pu tool. as long you dont understand that and believe in destiny your whole sex life will depend on coincidences (beeing successful when you accidently use pu tools without knowing it). pu is not something a few desperated guys invented theoretical out of the blue. if you want to read an interesting book about pu generally i can recommend "the game" by neil strauss. it covers everything from beginning, development of pu, positive aspects but also negative aspects of pu.
“Accidentally use pick-up tools without knowing it”, yeah right.

You can not accidentally use a hammer and accidentally beat something with it, this is bull-shit. This book you are talking about, “The Game”, says it all. Some people see it as a game, and many girls don’t want to play games. And the ones who want it, they are usually the bitches who play with your balls, the female version of players. This is why I can understand women who deal with players and who are sick of them, because I know how these “games” work, and have the same views about it. It is about using people, manipulation, and pretending to be interested in their personality when in fact they just want to fuck something.
Am0rIn0 wrote:simple negative example about doing effort for them: next time you meet a girl and date her, simply send her 10 sms or emails per day. send her roses and poems per mail. trust me she will not answer your phone calls anymore and will try to avoid you soon. if she is in you social circle she will tell that she simply has no time. stalking is just an extreme way to run after a woman you are attracted in: it shows to a women that you are needy and desperated.
Stalking is another extreme example, do you really only believe in black and white examples like that?
Of course it’s silly to bombard people with attention, nobody likes that.
If you love a person, it's logical that you don't want to stalk her. You will have the patience to give her time, and the trust that she will get back to you if she really likes you.
Am0rIn0 wrote:their subconscious want the same. their conscious want different things. i wrote that already many times, how often shall i repeat this?! did you get it now??
If ALL the women in the world only want alpha males in the end like you say, then why don’t we have the majority of men in the world being alone, and a small group of “leaders” who have hundreds or thousands of wives?

So this is really not true. It’s the same as saying, that all the men want submissive girls, this is also not true. Some men simply love to be dominated, and some girls want to take the lead, simply because EVERYBODY on this world is different. You can not say that all the women in the world have the same subconscious desires, because this is clearly not true. Why else would there be feminist groups, who want to lead over men? Do you think those women are psychological ill?
Am0rIn0 wrote:alwas keep one thing in mind: the female select their partners!
You are contradicting yourself now, because you always said that with the right tools, you can get any woman you want, and this is exactly the opposite of women selecting their partners.
But both is not true, because people select each other. again I say: Attraction comes from two ways, not only from one person to another!
Am0rIn0 wrote:ah ok here this is right. you see subconscious (instincts, feelings) vs conscious (what they want?). but now comes the question, what do they really want? that what their instincs say? or what their conscious say? this is the big question, thats why i say women dont really know what they want. the problem is you cant change their instincts, it would be similiar to train somebody to live without breathing.
If you want to know what they want, you should ask them. But I know already that you will not do that, because you think that they will tell you the opposite of what they want. It’s just a bad excuse for you to rape them, because then afterwards if they call the police, you can say that they wanted it, even if they told you that they didn’t. That’s the only reason why some men want to believe that women want the opposite of what they say.
What they consciously want is of course the only thing that counts, because it is the result of thinking. Instincts are just random thoughts, you can not take them seriously. If you see a gorgeous hot girl on the street and you only listen to your alpha male instincts, you should jump her, rip her clothes off, and rape her. If you see a rich guy driving a Ferrari and you want this car too, your instincts will tell you to kill him and take the car, so this is why instincts are not the leading reason for people’s behaviour, otherwise the world would be one big egocentric mess. Logical thinking must always be valued higher than people’s instincts. If the police catches you for rape, you can not tell to the judge: “But I did nothing wrong, I was only following my instincts!”. The judge will not say: “OK then, you can leave, your instincts are of course more important than your logical thinking.” These examples show, that your instincts can never be placed above logical thinking.
Am0rIn0 wrote:evolutionary strong would be as a men to create as much offspring as possible with as many women as possible
Last week I read a scientific article that exactly says the opposite, namely that MOST men want to keep one partner instead of as many as possible, so this is a lie. Look around you, how many men have harems like apes? Almost nobody, except some primitive tribes in Africa who live like that because of old traditional values, and who totally ignore the equality of women like we have in the modern world.