eurobabeforum.com

David Cameron cracks down on violent internet porn

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 25011.html

I am so fucking pissed off by this. Never mind that since this self righteous aristocratic ass fucker became Prime Minister food bank use jumped by over 300% he's going to go after LEGAL porn! The ignorant shit doesn't even understand how search engines work, how the "dark net" works and that if he typed in the word rape into any fucking tube site he won't get any videos returned because that shit is already fucking illegal! Goddamn motherfucker man! I thought this porn shit was resolved in the 80s

Banning child porn and violent/rape porn is not everything but softcore.

what is your definition of "softcore porn"?! there is nothing mentioned about softcore in that article.



"New laws were introduced in 2008 to outlaw the possession of “extreme pornography”, defined as “images that depict acts which threaten a person’s life” or “are likely to result in serious injury to a person’s anus, breasts or genitals”. Possession of images of bestiality or necrophilia is also illegal.

However, the laws do not cover staged rape, and only Scotland has made possession of such material illegal."


it is good tha staged rape scenes become illegal! some fellows these days otherwise could think that women feel pleasure during a rape and could get the big idea to try it someday.

Child porn and real rape porn is already illegal! He wants to implement a nationwide adult content filter that you must write into your ISP to opt-out of (and no doubt end up on some kind of government "deviant" list).

And, you're not going to find any of that real abusive shit on regular internet search engines. He wants to ban porn that "simulates rape" or is "aggressive" against women. Who defines that? Does gaping count? What about DP? Maybe EBI? Or is it just the DAP thread that will be illegal? There are backers of this law who for them nearly every single type of pornography is simulated rape because the only women that do porn must be "coerced"! Which, leaves, softcore porn as the only thing they can't ban (also because the two main newspapers that back this shitty right-wing government feature lots of topless girls on a regular basis)

You guys really didn't think it through. This law has nothing to do with protecting children. If he wanted to protect children he should put more money in the child protection services and anti-pedophile police (both have had massive budget cuts) than force every single internet user into a government controlled filter. And you know what's next? YouTube videos, filesharing sites, maybe some news websites, and it goes on and on.

Open your eyes, man! Porn is at the frontier of free speech.

not quite the filter is to stop porn getting to under 18s you have to opt to see adult content like the stuff here. It won't won't allow you to access child porn and other illegal content.

As to the funding issue this is a Conservative government they always announce cuts because it plays well to the pensioners/well off who actually vote Conservative.

hopless3 wrote:not quite the filter is to stop porn getting to under 18s you have to opt to see adult content like the stuff here. It won't won't allow you to access child porn and other illegal content.

As to the funding issue this is a Conservative government they always announce cuts because it plays well to the pensioners/well off who actually vote Conservative.

If you're worried about your kids watching porn then buy or download free filters for your computers and devices at home. I don't have kids and I don't need a government filter forcing me to opt-in everytime I change ISP. It's not the government's job to make the internet safe for kids; that's the parents job! Also, who defines what is "bad" porn here? Will there be some high council of morally sanctimonious pervs that will watch porn all day and decide what's legal and what isn't? I'm pretty sure most of the porn that is advertised here (like Sineplex, Woodmancasting, Analteenangles, 21st Century) falls under the broad definition of "simulated extreme sex."

haha, something tells me prostitution is going to increase heavily after that ban.....where else will they get their release from?

I'm sure they will manage to deny access to Porn Sites they same way that they haven't managed to stop access to all the Torrent sites that you aren't meant to be able to access in the UK

Gerald 78 wrote:

IMaRetArd wrote:haha, something tells me prostitution is going to increase heavily after that ban.....where else will they get their release from?

London is one of the most prolific city for escorting in Europe and the most competitive. Nothing will change with the ban other the political correctness and vote gathering of politicians.

I perfectly agree on this. They ban porn to leave only rich people fucking high class escorts in London hotels!

Am0rIn0 wrote:it is good tha staged rape scenes become illegal! some fellows these days otherwise could think that women feel pleasure during a rape and could get the big idea to try it someday.

The problem of course, is how broad that definition is. What about consensual BDSM sex where one participant is tied and gagged? Does this count as "staged rape"? What about abduction fantasy? Both of those scenarios involve all parties consenting in reality but perhaps depicted otherwise on screen. It's a totally legitimate sexual lifestyle, but does this suddenly become evil rape porn and all these consenting adults are now outlawed rape purveyors?

Philanderer81 wrote:If you're worried about your kids watching porn then buy or download free filters for your computers and devices at home. I don't have kids and I don't need a government filter forcing me to opt-in everytime I change ISP.

I totally agree. Why should we all suffer for someone else's lifestyle choice? I chose not to have kids, now I have to phone up my ISP and beg them to let me see porn? It should be the exact opposite. Don't want your kids watching porn? YOU phone your ISP and tell them to put the filters ON.

The bigger problem is, of course, when the infrastructure and the software is in place in the ISPs to filter, next thing you know it's "pirate content"....after that it's wikileaks or basically any site they don't like, and boom, we're living in China.

KUTProductions wrote:

Am0rIn0 wrote:it is good tha staged rape scenes become illegal! some fellows these days otherwise could think that women feel pleasure during a rape and could get the big idea to try it someday.

The problem of course, is how broad that definition is. What about consensual BDSM sex where one participant is tied and gagged? Does this count as "staged rape"? What about abduction fantasy? Both of those scenarios involve all parties consenting in reality but perhaps depicted otherwise on screen. It's a totally legitimate sexual lifestyle, but does this suddenly become evil rape porn and all these consenting adults are now outlawed rape purveyors?

Philanderer81 wrote:If you're worried about your kids watching porn then buy or download free filters for your computers and devices at home. I don't have kids and I don't need a government filter forcing me to opt-in everytime I change ISP.

I totally agree. Why should we all suffer for someone else's lifestyle choice? I chose not to have kids, now I have to phone up my ISP and beg them to let me see porn? It should be the exact opposite. Don't want your kids watching porn? YOU phone your ISP and tell them to put the filters ON.

The bigger problem is, of course, when the infrastructure and the software is in place in the ISPs to filter, next thing you know it's "pirate content"....after that it's wikileaks or basically any site they don't like, and boom, we're living in China.

The British being the British one of the best lines I've read so far has been - "Went to bed last night and woke up in China this morning"