You have 2004 Models Total now

[deadip]

Cara was number 1999

Marry Queen was number 2000
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=13683

Eva Cats was number 2001
Charisma Cole was number 2002
Rebecca is EBI Model number 2003
Maleena is EBI Model number 2004

I'm sorry for making this new Post, but I wanted to bring this Error to your attention and didn't know where else to Post this. The reason I know this is because Cara was EBI Model 1999 for at least 2 weeks, before you added Marry Queen. Even the Link says Marry Queen is EBI's Model # 2000.

[Frigo]

actually you are right but one model had to be deleted. so the numbers are reduced by 1 now

[sbando]

Marry Queen is EBI's Model # 2000

She still is!

[deadip]

actually you are right but one model had to be deleted. so the numbers are reduced by 1 now

Then it had to be a Model before your Model # 1999. By the way, which one was it??? I'm NOT trying to make a big Deal out of this, whether it's 2003 or 2004 Babes you have.....you still have a lot of Babes and I really enjoy this Site and also enjoy contributing new info when I find it.

[sbando]

It's ok for people to ask, the fact is that they aren't 2000 0r 2004 anyway , because A LOT of them are no longer there. So she's the 2000th girl added no matter what, but she wasn't number 2000 of 2000 from the start.

Why are people still considering being listed in here as the only evidence of a porn past when their faces and asses are all over the Internet, it's another story and it's been discussed a million times.

The last girl removed was allegedly a minor, but I'm 99,9999999% sure it's bullshit. It's funny to note that the only site showing her in action DID NOT DELETE the scene, while we received a formal letter by a lawyer (before Bunny chimes in, I KNOW it's bullshit, but it's not something worth fighting for).

[robot]

that stupid whore will be back on ebi as soon as we hear from our lawyer and PW's side. Note to the model's "lawyer": your gross ignorance of european laws and in particular the commercial conditions of websites and website affiliates speak volume. Did I forget to mention that, in addition to the latter, if indeed that stupid whore was a minor, could you tell me on which planet everybody else is supposed to know that she forged documents? maybe on your stupid planet, forging documents is not illegal? maybe in your stupid brain, in your ridiculous attempt of a scare tactic, you're not aware of the fact that no affiliate has access to model releases? in closing: fuck you, dumb bitches. and happy new year.

[sbando]

Yeah, but what are you gonna do about it. I wonder if PW's site is blocked in Latvia.

[robot]

i'm gonna do exactly what i wrote...

[just_me]

Perhaps if Woodman were even half-way respectful of the girls he exploits, then maybe, just maybe they would be a little more respectful back.

I swear, from reading through that "man"'s forum he is just as much delusional as he is an egomaniac

I'd love to elaborate more, but that damn self-preservation instinct just won't let me There are ways to create and sell porn on foundations of respect and honesty. I'm just a nobody far, far away from any piece of the industry, yet I would trust that "man" only as far as I can throw him - mind you I never want to ever actually touch that creep either - and my scales are already pre-adjusted to pornographer levels.

But I will propose this question, who here thinks that the path out of this so-called porn "crisis" is by holding true to the "traditional" methods of obtaining performing talents?

[tatiscevo]

Sorry to enter here, I just want to say something:
I can't understand how some girls start at porno just thinking this won't be seen by thousand of people; surely someone near to them (family, friends...). Internet is everywhere; for ex: I'm sure in Russia million of people have access to internet, so they have access to porn.

Girls, just think before you must regret

[sbando]

Perhaps if Woodman were even half-way respectful of the girls he exploits

I'm pretty sure he has little to do with the issue at hand.

[rashidnz]

I am Hoping Natasha Nice will be listed as 2010 for 2010

As to the model dare I ask who it was who was allegedly "underage"?

I joined Woodmans aka PW forum to discuss some stuff with him

Thanks

[sbando]

A girl called Ramona, but she wasn't underage, that's most likely a lie.