Admittedly, you're spot on at least as far as the flimsy, "shithouse" feel of their site goes but as I wouldn't know USC from HIV I'll take for granted your more detailed technical assessments & comparisons as being similarly kosher. I also understand your suspicions per my glowing review but you'll need to take my word in kind as I am not affiliated at all except for being a recent member who just before went through a hellish attempt at being a member at another site as I openly admitted in the write-up and further how such resulting prejudices, skewed state of mind, and their obvious contributions to distortion happened to work in PorGirls favor. I did though let them have it pretty good I think as far as general criticisms if not the 'nuts & bolts' technical issues. I said I liked based on overall content & simplicity but I listed many faults and as I don't have sufficient background & experience to give them such a technical ass-raping as you have I still think I played a significant part in their resulting limp.
But...what I didn't say as I could with some legitimacy per my limited tech qualifications is that said piss-me-off scansite was indeed much more professional looking though more complex but also w/ what I perceived as a more 'tidy' appearance and I guess also more modern & proper "textbook" design adherences & security measures. It pains me to give any credit whatsoever, those cocks, but I'm not so totally raving mad as not to recognize some elements of reality.
So as I was saying I understand these things you suspect because as you observed they are low-rent, shoddy, and even shaddy looking sum-bitches...very true...vids are low-res too, pics not easily grabbed, & so on but hey as I mentioned 'simple' as far as how I roll, offers my new 'buddies' a lot of slack and even a blind eye or maybe at least a half-turned eye depending on my mood, the weather & the present intensity of this new bond we formed at that specific time (actually 'I' & in 'my own mind alone' formed bond). So this is our own little 'la cosa nostra' even though I wouldn't want to meet that webmaster in a dark alley or anywhere else actually.
But just to spite the shady bastard, I can tell you how to get their entire library (per the movies anyway) for nothing & legally but for only a bit of time, copy pasting, and url permutation. Clue: Look at the free.sexbankroll.com galleries. The simple version of this clue and one that would be sufficient for someone w/ rudimentary tech know-how: look at a few of the galleries hosted there and outline their entire directory structure, and grab at will. More involved clue: note the url's of vids on the free.sexbankroll gallery pages, note numerical & sequencial directories & clip filenames, find the names & dir name boundaries, have basic html skill or learn, and bingo there's probably about 10-15 GIG of free porn that extends well beyond the little PorGirls solo subset - though mostly all is 15-20 sec clips but it's seemless played back to back to back etc to the not so picky like me PLUS it's the GOOD quality versions. SO yeah sure they are shady bastards but two can play at that game.
However, I again must say I really do like and continue to defend even though they are crazily $20 more per year the other jerkoff more classy place - if you prorate costs & best bargains & other cheapo crap that I pay little attention to. So lastly, as far as long load time, I too find it's initial page delay annoying but dismiss as it only needs to load once given proper foresight & familiarity with the layout - however I still do sometimes fuck up and have branches open and replace that motherload homebase page instead of a seperate tab - as the branches are btw very small, quick-loading serving SIMPLY as access points for respective broads' pics/movies. But even if I fuck up, my cable modem hums along quite nice. A 10-15 sec load at the very most isn't going to chap my ass too much knowing I have little else to worry about if I take some simple precautions.
Regards