deadsbando wrote:Yes, it's a good idea.
Frigo wrote:I don't see a real need for seperated forums. Europe is Europe!
Well there seems to be some difference of opinion among the powers that be.
As for me, i'd like to see the Forum & the Index expand to full coverage from to the entire Russia and even exceptionally former Soviet Central Asian states for ethnic Europeans (I recall 1 or 2 Russian babes from countries like Khazakistan and/or Uzbekistan. I don't think we'll be confronted with too many real Tajik or Kyrgyz pornstars in the foreseeable future.)
Is the current criterion on the Index for West Euro girls that they have worked for eastern productions or physically in the east? Or is still just ad hoc? for adding them, ie up to the tastes or whims of the admin? Some kind of reasonable set of criterion should be created for expanding to full continental coverage.
Additions could be added gradually. They will never eclipse our beloved eastern girls, so noone need worry. There are way more girls coming up in Hungary, Czech, Romania & Russia -- probably as many as in the US (but there's no resource i know of that monitors this), and certainly more than the rest of Europe combined.
The index is a unique resource as far as i know. (WhichPornstar is kind of a ale imitation, really only good for links. And their coverage of British girls is spotty at best.) It would be great to tear down the "Velvet Curtain" and bring it all together eventually. You culd bring in moderators with expertise in Britain or wherever else..
As for the forum, you could just keep it all in BABES or split off WestEuroBabes from the rest, or even create an AmerBabes (with Canadians) section. Other smaller contributors like Brazil, Argentina, Israel etc could then be placed in another category.
I guess i'm kind of "anal' about all this, but that's the nature of listing, indexing, filmography etc. It appeals to the male hunter-gatherer instinct for collecting things.. like beautiful women.