I did nothing like this at all, although I confess my post was not very clear. I have heard too many times my posts are too long. So I guess I am making them too short now.Xenomorgue wrote:b]Socratic[/b] irony: Walter Burns in the role of the scholar who disputes the elementary facts on cell division.![]()
I don't question cell division. I do question the comparison between cell division and the history of EBI/EBT. The process of cell division -- "cells divide into two identical copies" -- does not describe what happened in the case of EBI/EBT. There was neither 1 single cell, nor are there copies now. Hence the judgement of "wrong on both counts".
Instead of biological growth, you should look to processes of social conflict to describe the EBI/EBT split.
OK, now I am boring all over.